PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor echte frage : QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam

Nach dem Kauf keine Wartezeit: Die Übungsfragen zur ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfung von EchteFrage erreichen Sie innerhalb einer Minute per E-Mail. Beginnen Sie sofort mit der gezielten Vorbereitung auf die PECB QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor.

PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsübersicht:

Zertifizierungsanbieter:	PECB
Prüfungsname:	Prüfung zum zertifizierten ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor bei PECB
Prüfungsnummer:	ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Exam
Mindestpunktzahl:	70 %
Verfügbare Sprachen:	Chinesisch, Französisch, Deutsch, Spanisch, Englisch, Portugiesisch, Arabisch
Anzahl der Fragen:	80 Multiple-Choice-Fragen
Verwandte Zertifizierungen:	ISO 9001:2015 Foundation QMS ISO 9001:2015 Internal Auditor ISO 19011 Lead Auditor ISO 9001:2015 Lead Implementer
Prüfungsgebühr:	Variiert je nach Region (üblicherweise etwa 500–800 USD)
Gültigkeitsdauer des Zertifikats:	3 Jahre (zur Aufrechterhaltung der Gültigkeit ist eine Erneuerung erforderlich)
Prüfungsdauer:	180 Minuten
Prüfungsformat:	Prüfung ohne Hilfsmittel, Szenariobasierte Fragen, Multiple-Choice-Fragen
Empfohlenes Training:	Schulungsmaterialien zum QMS nach ISO 9001:2015 Schulung zum PECB ISO 9001 Lead Auditor
Prüfungsanmeldung:	Portal zur Prüfungsanmeldung bei PECB Offizielle Zertifizierungsseite von PECB
Beispielfragen:
Prüfungsmethode:	Online-Prüfung unter Aufsicht oder Vor-Ort-Prüfung (je nach zugelassenem Anbieter von PECB)
Voraussetzungen:	Empfohlen: Grundkenntnisse der ISO 9001:2015 oder vorherige Erfahrung im Bereich von Qualitätsmanagementsystemen oder Auditierung.
Offizielle Syllabus-URL:	https://pecb.com

PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsthemen:

ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungs-FAQ: Ihre Fragen, unsere Antworten

PECB QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen

Frage #1

Scenario 7: POLKA is a car manufacturing company based in Stockholm, Sweden. The company has around
14,000 employees working in different sectors which help with the design, painting, assembling, and test drives of the final product. The company is widely known for its qualitative products and affordable prices. In order to retain their reputation, POLKA implemented a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO
9001.
Before applying for certification, the company decided to conduct an internal audit to check whether there are any nonconformities in their QMS and if the requirements of ISO 9001 are being fulfilled. The top management appointed Sean, the internal auditor, as the team leader of the internal audit team. Sean required from the top management to have unrestricted access to the employees and executives of POLKA and to the documented information. Furthermore, Sean required to establish a team with a large number of auditors, considering the size and the complexity of the organization. The top management of POLKA agreed with Sean ' s requirements.
The top management, in cooperation with Sean, assigned 10 more employees to the audit team. Following that. Sean planned the audit activities and assigned the roles and responsibilities to each auditor. They began by interviewing employees of different manufacturing departments to check whether they are aware of the process of the QMS implementation. While conducting these activities, one of the auditors asked Sean for permission to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis, as he was very familiar with the processes of the department.
Along the way, the teams findings showed that the staff were trained, documented information was updated, and the QMS fulfilled the requirements of ISO 9001. The internal audit took three weeks to complete, and on the last week the audit team held a final meeting The team shared their results and together drafted the audit report This report was submitted to the top management of the company. The report was maintained as documented information, and was available to the relevant interested parties.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
According to Scenario 7, one of the auditors requested permission from Sean to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis. Should Sean grant the auditor permission?

A. Yes, but Sean himself must be present in every audit activity
B. No, internal auditors should be independent of the processes being audited
C. Yes, Sean should grant the auditor permission

Frage #2

The procedures of an organisation require that all purchase orders have to be signed by the Purchasing Manager, or, in her absence, by the Production Manager. During an audit carried out in November 2020, an auditor determined that during three weeks in February 2020, the purchase orders were not signed. You raise a nonconformance under Clause 8.4.3 of ISO 9001:2015.
Which one of the following answers would you accept as a ' correction ' from the Purchasing Manager?

A. I do not accept the nonconformity. Anything I may ask my employees to do will be seen as another piece of evidence that complying with ISO 9001 requirements is a bureaucratic valueless burden.
B. During those weeks, as I was on holiday, the production manager should have signed those purchase orders. As a correction to this particular nonconformity, I will ask him to sign them.
C. All products related to those purchase orders have already been successfully used during the first quarter of 2020, therefore there is no need for correction. We will only take corrective action.
D. I will sign all the purchase orders now. It will take some time to print them since they are on a backup disk, but I will get them done before the end of the audit.

Frage #3

You work for an organisation, ' A ' , which provides packaged food to the public. You are asked to lead a team (you as the leader and two other auditors) to audit a supplier, ' B ' , which provides packaging materials to your organisation. It is 4 p.m. and the audit is close to an end; you are having an internal meeting with the team to decide what will be presented to the auditee during the Closing meeting.
The Closing meeting was scheduled
for 5 p.m.
You, as audit team leader, audited top management, the laboratory, and the storage of raw materials.
Auditor 1 audited the two manufacturing lines and dispatch areas.
You to Auditor 1: " What findings would you report? "
Auditor 1: " When reviewing the Dispatch records, I noticed that during the morning two different trucks (Number 011 and 025) delivered the same batch number of the product (Batch 33555). Truck 011 left the plant at 9.15 am and Truck 025 left the plant at
11.30 am. Procedure P-02 Rev.3 says
that trucks should carry a complete batch. The batch number, once on the truck, is captured using a QR device. " You: " OK, what do you think? " Auditor 2: " I think that this is a nonconformity. " You: " OK. How would you describe the evidence on which the nonconformity will be based " ?
Identify which one of the following statements best describes the identified nonconformity.

A. A product delivered to the client was not identified as required in P-02 Rev 3.
B. Dispatch personnel are not fully aware of the need to conform to written procedures.
C. Dispatch personnel do not always carry out its activities in conformance with Procedure P-02 rev 3.
D. The batch 33555 was delivered split in two different trucks (011 and 025).

Frage #4

Scenario 4:
TD Advertising is a print management company based in Chicago. The company offers design services, digital printing, storage, and distribution. As TD expanded, its management recognized that success depended on adopting new technologies and improving quality.
To ensure customer satisfaction and quality improvement, the company decided to pursue ISO 9001 certification.
After implementing the QMS, TD hired a well-known certification body for an audit. Anne Key was appointed as the audit team leader. She received a document listing the audit team members, audit scope, criteria, duration, and audit engagement limits.
Anne reviewed the document and approved the audit mandate. The certification body and TD's top management signed the certification agreement.
Before contacting TD, Anne reviewed the audit scope and noticed that TD made changes to it due to the adoption of new printing equipment. However, Anne disagreed with the changes, stating they would affect the audit timeline. She considered withdrawing from the audit.
Scenario 4 mentions that Anne received a document that contained the audit scope, criteria, duration, and the limits to the audit engagement. What did Anne receive in this case?

A. The audit offer.
B. The audit mandate.
C. The certification agreement.
D. The audit plan.

Frage #5

During a third-party audit of a pharmaceutical company (CD9000) having seven COVID-19 vaccination stations in various terminals at a major international airport, you, as audit team leader, interview the CD9000' s Supervisor in Terminal 2.
You: "I see that the temperature of the freezer where you keep the vaccines reads -17.2 °C. I understood that the upper limit for storing vaccines was < -18.0 °C." Supervisor: "Yes, I know this. But do not worry, the people who calibrated the temperature sensors said that they have an uncertainty of +/- 1 °C. So, we ensure that the reading remains between -17 °C and -19 °C." From the following, select two options that would form your next step.

A. Ask to see the calibration report for the measuring equipment.
B. Considering that the difference of less than 1 degree is insignificant, accept the comment and proceed with the audit.
C. Ask to see the competence records of the supervisors of all terminals.
D. Raise a non-conformance for storing vaccine at a temperature higher than the maximum value established in the test specification.
E. Ask to see the documented test method to determine if there is additional information on the limits for storage temperature.
F. Immediately halt the vaccination process due to the risk to patients.

Fragen und Antworten: